- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Technology Acceptance Model in using E-learning on Early Childhood Teacher Education Program’s student during pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i2.801Keywords:
technology acceptance model, behavioral intention, e-learning, partial least square-structural equation modelAbstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic many education institutions implement e-learning as a replacement of traditional face to face teaching and learning activities. This situation forced students and teachers to adapt to the new normal of teaching and learning activity. This study aimed to examine the determinant factors of behavioral intention of using e-learning associated with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) for early childhood teacher education students. The factors included in the model are perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude, behavioral intention, self-efficacy, subjective norm, and system accessibility. Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) technique was employed with SmartPLS as a computational software. Using samples students in Early Childhood Teacher Education Program in Muhammadiyah University of Jember – Indonesia, this study result that perceived usefulness affects behavioral intention directly while self-efficacy affect behavioral intention directly and indirectly through perceived usefulness.Downloads Statistics
Download data is not yet available.
References
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 16(2), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/249577
Al-Adwan, A., Al-Adwan, A., & Smedley, J. (2013). Exploring students acceptance of e-learning using Technology Acceptance Model in Jordanian Universities. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 9(2), 4–18.
Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the Technology Acceptance Model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2014.050120
Bandura, A. (2012). Social Cognitive Theory. In P. A. M. Van-Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 1 (Vol. 1, pp. 349–374). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n18
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Djikstra, T. K. (2010). Latent Variables and Indices: Herman Wold’s Basic Design and Partial Least Squares. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (Vol. II, pp. 23–46). Heidelberg: Springer.
Echterhoff, G. (2012). Shared-Reality Theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 2 (Vol. 2, pp. 180–198). London.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Latham, R. L. (2006). Multivariant Data Analysis. New Jersey: Pearson International Edition.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Advertising Research: Basic Concepts and Recent Issues. In S. Okazaki (Ed.), Handbook of Research in International Advertising (pp. 252–276). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576
Ismawati, D., & Prasetyo, I. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Menggunakan Video Zoom Cloud Meeting pada Anak Usia Dini Era Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 665. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i1.671
Kim, C. M., Kim, M. K., Lee, C. J., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005
Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information and Management, 42(8), 1095–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007
Lohmöller, J. B. (1989). Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Physica.
Luan, W. S., & Teo, T. (2009). Investigating the technology acceptance among student teachers in Malaysia: An application of the technology acceptance model (TAM). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.3860/taper.v18i2.1327
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nurdin, N., & Anhusadar, L. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Online Pendidik PAUD di Tengah Pandemi Covid 19. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 686. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i1.699
Padilla-Meléndez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers and Education, 63, 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014
Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding students’ behavioral intention to use e-Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2014.14
Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x
Straub, D., Keil, M., & Brenner, W. (1997). Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study. Information and Management, 33(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00026-8
Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., & Wong, S. L. (2009). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers and Education, 53(3), 1000–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.017
Teo, T., & van Schaik, P. (2009). Understanding T echnology Acceptance Teachers : in Pre-Service T eachers : A Structural-Equation Modeling Approach. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), 47–66.
Van, D., McLaws, M.-L., Crimmins, J., MacIntyre, C. R., & Seale, H. (2010). University life and pandemic influenza: Attitudes and intended behaviour of staff and students towards pandemic (H1N1) 2009. BMC Public Health, 10(130). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-130
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Wold, H. (1982). Soft Modeling: The Basic Design and Some Extensions. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems Under Indirect Observations: Part II (pp. 1–54). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Yuen, A. H. K., & Ma, W. W. K. (2004). Knowledge sharing and teacher acceptance of web based learning system. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 975–983). Perth. Retrieved from https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/perth04/procs/yuen.html
Downloads
Published
05-12-2020
Check Article Index
How to Cite
Jatmikowati, T. E., Rachman, A. U., & Adwitiya, A. B. (2020). Technology Acceptance Model in using E-learning on Early Childhood Teacher Education Program’s student during pandemic. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(2), 1501–1511. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i2.801
Issue
Section
Articles
