- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Critical Thinking and Collaboration Skills in Catholic Religious Education: A Study of Junior High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v9i1.6751Keywords:
critical thinking, collaboration, catholic religious subjectsAbstract
The aims of this research is to find out the critical thinking and collaboration skills of the junior high students in catholic religious subjects. This is a quantitative approach with a descriptive method.The research population were the eighth students of junior high school in Palangkaraya, totaling 35 students. The research instrument used 8 questions for critical thinking skill and 8 questions for collaboration skill. The collected data analyzed using the descriptive analysis. The results of the analysis show that the critical thinking and collaboration of the students are in the middle criteria. Some reasons can be concluded such as teachers' lack of ability to integrate learning that leads to critical and collaborative thinking, monotonous learning activities and the lack of familiarity with religious learning being made into arguments and discussions.
Downloads Statistics
References
Aston, K. J. (2024). ’Why is this hard, to have critical thinking?’Exploring the factors affecting critical thinking with international higher education students. Active Learning in Higher EducationVolume 25, Issue 3, November 2024, Pages 537-550 https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874231168341
Cobo, C. (2013). Skills for innovation: envisioning an education that prepares for the changing world, The Curriculum Journal, 24:1, 67-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2012.744330
Esmat, & Rawan. (2024). Navigating the confluence of artificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of industry 4.0: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical . . .. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652623046851
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Gokhale, A.A. (2012). Collaborative Learning and Critical Thinking. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_910
Julia, N., John, E., & Siegrid. (2009). Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13561820802338579
Kimberly, J., & Ways. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0034654307309921
Klein. (1993). More Than a Required Skill in Today’s Curriculum: Critical Thinking and Collaborative Learning in Foreign Languages. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED355795
Kumaran, R. (2021). Learning Interventions: Collaborative Learning, Critical Thinking and Assessing Participation Real-Time. In: Evidence-Based Teaching for the 21st Century Classroom and Beyond. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6804-0_3
Minchi, & Michael. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131510002526
Panitz. (1999). The Case for Student Centered Instruction via Collaborative Learning Paradigms. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED448444
Parker, L. (2016). Religious environmental education? The new school curriculum in Indonesia. Environmental Education Research, 23(9), 1249–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1150425
Popil, I. (2011). Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method, Nurse Education Today, Volume 31, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 204-207, ISSN 0260-6917, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.002.
Pudjiarti, E S. (2024). Learning From the Past, moving into the Future: Revitalizing Catholic Theological Education in an Era of Technological Disruption Through the Franciscan Spirit. https://publisher.stipas.ac.id/index.php/pbs/issue/view/8
Williams. (2023). Education Evolution: Pedagogical Techniques for the Modern World. https://ijrrt.com/index.php/ijrrt/article/view/17

