Pengembangan Instrumen Kemampuan Berpikir Matematika dalam Perkembangan Kognitif anak usia dini

Authors

  • Feri Faila Sufa Pendidikan Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia
  • Ch. Evy Tri Widyahening Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i3.3646

Keywords:

asesemen pembelajaran, berpikir matematika, kognitif anak usia dini

Abstract

Assesmen tentang kemampuan berpikir matematika pada anak usia dini sangat dibutuhkan untuk mengetahui kemampuan kognitif anak. Konsep berpikir matematika anak dapat digunakan untuk mengetahui kemampuan menganalisa dan memecahkan masalah. Tujuan artikel ini untuk mengembangkan instrumen Berpikir Konsep Matematika melalui kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi melalui studi RnD oleh Borg & Gall yang dimodifikasi. menjadi 3 tahap.  Pertama adalah penyusunan konsep variabel yang akan di ukur hingga  menyusun kisi-kisi instrumen yang disesuaikan dengan  indikator perilaku. Kedua,  melakukan validasi isi kepada ahli bahasa, psikologi, evaluasi pendidikan, matematika dan praktisi; Ketiga, melakukan validasi konstruk untuk mendapatkan konsistensi internal dengan batas nilai > 0,3 pada masing-masing butir dengan menggunakan analisis product moment dan melakukan uji coba kelayakan dan Instrument ini di katakan valid untuk mengasesmen kemampuan berpikir matematika pada anak usia dini. Instrumen ini adalah instrumen observasi, dengan analisis interrater reliability adalah 0,932 yang signifikan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ananda, E. R., & Wandini, R. R. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Self Efficacy Siswa. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(5), 5113–5126. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i5.2659

Asiah, N. (2018). Pembelajaran Calistung Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Dan Ujian Masuk Calistung Sekolah Dasar Di Bandar Lampung. Terampil : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 5(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.24042/terampil.v5i1.2746

Auld, E., & Morris, P. (2019). The OECD and IELS: Redefining early childhood education for the 21st century. Policy Futures in Education, 17(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318823949

Azwar, S. (2017). Reliablitas dan Validitas (IV). Pustaka Pelajar.

Brandmiller, C., Dumont, H., & Becker, M. (2020). Teacher Perceptions of Learning Motivation and Classroom Behavior: The Role of Student Characteristics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 101893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101893

Burdman, P. (2018). The mathematics of Opportunity. diffusio(November), 222–245.

Caesens, Stinglhamber, F., & Luypaert, G. (2014). Article Information - Home Article Information - Home. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(2), 2–3.

Caesens, Stinglhamber, F., & Luypaert, G. (2014). Article Information - Home Article Information - Home. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(2), 2–3.

Chairilsyah, D. (2018). Mengidentifikasi Indikator Kognitif Dan Membuat Instrumen Perkembangan Kognitif Pada Anak Usia Dini (O. Puspita (ed.); 1st ed.). UR Press Pekanbaru.

Clark, C. A. C., Hudnall, R. H., & Pérez-González, S. (2020). Children’s neural responses to a novel mathematics concept. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 20, 100128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100128

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2018). Myths of early math. Education Sciences, 8(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020071

Endrayanto, H. Y. S. (2021). Strategi Menilai Ketrampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (HOTS) (C. Heni (ed.)). PT Kanisius.

Ertle, B. B., Ginsburg, H. P., Cordero, M. I., Curran, T. M., Manlapig, L., & Morgenlander, M. (2008). The Essence of Early Childhood Mathematics Education and the Professional Development Needed to Support It. In Mathematical Difficulties (First Edit). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373629-1.50006-X

Fitriarosah, N. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Untuk Siswa Smp. 1(1), 27–41.

Hulukati, W., & Rahmi, M. (2020). Instrumen Evaluasi Karakter Mahasiswa Program Pendidikan Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(2), 851. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v4i2.468

Hulukati, W., & Rahmi, M. (2020). Instrumen Evaluasi Karakter Mahasiswa Program Pendidikan Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(2), 851. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v4i2.468

Ibrahimy, U., Situbondo, S., Heryandi, M. T., Ibrahimy, U., Situbondo, S., Ibrahimy, U., & Situbondo, S. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Higher Order Thinking Skill Pada Mata Pelajaran Pai. JpII, 2(April), 199–206.

Kaskens, J., Segers, E., Goei, S. L., van Luit, J. E. H., & Verhoeven, L. (2020). Impact of Children’s math self-concept, math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and teacher competencies on math development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 103096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103096

Kaskens, J., Segers, E., Goei, S. L., van Luit, J. E. H., & Verhoeven, L. (2020). Impact of Children’s math self-concept, math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and teacher competencies on math development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 103096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103096

Khumaedi, M. (2012). Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Pendidikan. In Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin Unnes (Vol. 12, Issue 1, pp. 25–0). http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id

Koenig, J. A. (2011). 21 ST CENTURY SKILLS Summary of a Workshop. In Social Sciences.

Legette, K. B., & Kurtz-Costes, B. (2021). Math track placement and reflected classroom appraisals are related to changes in early adolescents’ math self-concept. Educational Psychology, 41(5), 602–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1760212

Lutfatulatifah, L., & Yuliyanto, S. W. (2017). Persepsi Guru tentang Membaca, Menulis, dan Berhitung pada Anak Usia Dini. Golden Age: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 1(1), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.29313/ga.v1i1.2766

Nasir, A. (2018). POLEMIK CALISTUNG UNTUK ANAK USIA DINI (Telaah Konsep Development Approriate Practice). ThufuLA: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Guru Raudhatul Athfal, 6(2), 325. https://doi.org/10.21043/thufula.v6i2.4759

Nuryatmawati, “Azizah Muthi,†& Dimyati, D. (2021). Efektifitas Pendekatan Saintifik terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Anak Usia 3-6 Tahun. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(2), 2071–2081. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i2.1048

Permana*, R. A. H. A., Widodo, A., Setiawan, W., & Sriyati, S. (2021). Penggunaan Penskor Jawaban Esai Otomatis dalam Pengukuran Pengetahuan Guru. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 5(4), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v5i4.22724

Putri, A. A., & Suparno. (2020). Recognize Geometry Shapes through Computer Learning in Early Math Skills. JPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 14(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.141.04

Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., Altman, D. G., Booth, A., Chan, A. W., Chang, S., Clifford, T., Dickersin, K., Egger, M., Gøtzsche, P. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Groves, T., Helfand, M., … Whitlock, E. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ (Online), 349(January), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647

Slot, P. (2018). Structural characteristics and process quality in early childhood education and care: A literature review. OECD Education Working Paper, 176, 65. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/earlychildhoodeducationandcare.htm.

Sudarsana, K. N. ., Antara, P. ., & Dibia, I. . . (2020). Kelayakan instrumen penilaian keaktifan belajar ppkn. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 8(2), 150–158.

Sufa, F. F., & Setiawan, M. H. Y. (2021). The Introduction of Mathematic Concept in Early Childhood Education: HOTS Skill Stimulation. AWLADY : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 7(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.24235/awlady.v7i2.8079

Sunarni, N. (2017). Komparasi Kearifan Lokal Sunda Dan Jepang: Pembentuk Karakter Anak. JENTERA: Jurnal Kajian Sastra, 6(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.26499/jentera.v6i1.327

Syamsuryadin, S., & Wahyuniati, C. F. S. (2017). Tingkat Pengetahuan Pelatih Bola Voli Tentang Program Latihan Mental Di Kabupaten Sleman Yogyakarta. Jorpres (Jurnal Olahraga Prestasi), 13(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.21831/jorpres.v13i1.12884

Tambunan, H. (2019). The Effectiveness of the Problem Solving Strategy and the Scientific Approach to Students’ Mathematical Capabilities in High Order Thinking Skills. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5715

Vousden, B., Wilkes-Gillan, S., Cordier, R., & Froude, E. (2019). The play skills of children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder in peer-to-peer interactions with their classmates: A multiple case study design. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 66(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12530

Walid, A., Sajidan, S., Ramli, M., & Kusumah, R. G. T. (2019). Construction of the assessment concept to measure students’ high order thinking skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.528180

Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Siegler, R. S., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2014). What’s Past Is Prologue: Relations Between Early Mathematics Knowledge and High School Achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14553660

Winitri, R., & Nurani, Y. (2020). Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Anak Usia 6-7 Tahun ditinjau dari Pemahaman Guru Abstrak. 4(2), 491–501. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v4i1.402

Wulansuci, G., & Kurniati, E. 2019. (2019). Pembelajaran Calistung ( Membaca , Menulis , Berhitung) Dengan Resiko Terjadinya Stress Akademik Pada Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Tunas Siliwangi, 5(1), 38–44.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

08-07-2023

Check Article Index

How to Cite

Sufa, F. F., & Widyahening, C. E. T. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Kemampuan Berpikir Matematika dalam Perkembangan Kognitif anak usia dini. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(3), 3819–3830. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i3.3646

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).