- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Tren dan Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Komputasional Anak Usia Dini pada Abad 21: Perspektif Teoretis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i4.4005Keywords:
berpikir komputasional, anak usia dini, teori, perspektif, 21st CenturyAbstract
Computational Thinking (CT) sedang menjadi tren yang perlu dikembangkan sejak dini pada abad ke-21. Cara paling efisien untuk membuat anak memperoleh keterampilan ini dengan memasukkan CT ke dalam pendidikan K-12 atau kurikulum PAUD. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keterampilan berpikir komputasional pada anak usia dini dilihat dari perspektif teori. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode literature review. Temuan menunjukkan masih banyaknya terjadi kesalahpahaman dalam mendefinisikan keterampilan CT. Kurangnya pengetahuan tentang CT adalah tantangan terbesar bagi sebagian besar guru anak usia dini mengidentifikasi secara akurat dalam proses pembelajaran anak sehingga masih sulit untuk diimplementasikan dalam PAUD. Hasil temuan juga menyimpulkan secara sederhana keterampilan CT adalah pemikiran logis, pemecahan masalah, penggunaan algoritme, pengkodean/pemrograman. Rekomendasi yang disampaikan adalah bukti empiris tentang keterampilan CT harus dipelajari, dikuasai dan dipahami terlebih dahulu ketika merancang pengalaman belajar yang efektif bagi guru PAUD dan calon guru.
ÂDownloads
References
Aho, A. V. (2012). Computation and computational thinking. Computer Journal, 55(7), 833–835. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxs074
Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. (2020). Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges. In Computers in Human Behavior (Vol. 105, p. 106185). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185
Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 47–57.
Bakala, E., Gerosa, A., Hourcade, J. P., & Tejera, G. (2021). Preschool children, robots, and computational thinking: A systematic review. In International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction (Vol. 29, p. 100337). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100337
Balanskat, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2014). Computing our future Computer programming and coding - Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. In European Schoolnet (EUN Partnership AISBL). European Schoolnet. http://www.eun.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=521cb928-6ec4-4a86-b522-9d8fd5cf60ce&groupId=43887
Barr, V. (2022). Computational thinking. In Computing Handbook: Two-Volume Set (Vol. 49, Issue 3, pp. 1–12). ACM New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16812-3
Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
Bers, M. U. (2013). Blocks to Robots: Learning with Technology in the Early Childhood Classroom. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9). Teachers College Press.
Bers, M. U. (2018). Coding and Computational Thinking in Early Childhood: The Impact of ScratchJr in Europe. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 8. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/3868
Bers, M. U. (2021). Coding, robotics and socio-emotional learning: Developing a palette of virtues. In Pixel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educacion (Issue 62, pp. 309–322). https://doi.org/10.12795/PIXELBIT.90537
Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers and Education, 72, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020
Bers, M. U., González-González, C., & Armas-Torres, M. B. (2019). Coding as a playground: Promoting positive learning experiences in childhood classrooms. Computers and Education, 138, 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.013
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education - Implications for Policy and Practice. In Joint Research Centre (JRC) (Issue June). Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Annual American Educational Research Association Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1, 1–25. ~kbrennan/files/Brennan_Resnick_AERA2012_CT.pdfhttp://web.media.mit.edu/
Brown, N. C. C., Sentance, S., Crick, T., & Humphreys, S. (2014). Restart: The resurgence of computer science in UK schools. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(2), 1–22.
Buitrago Flórez, F., Casallas, R., Hernández, M., Reyes, A., Restrepo, S., & Danies, G. (2017). Changing a Generation’s Way of Thinking: Teaching Computational Thinking Through Programming. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 834–860. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317710096
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. In Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. https://doi.org/10.14527/9789756802748
Cabrera, L. (2019). Teacher Preconceptions of Computational Thinking: A Systematic Literature Review. Jl. of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(3), 305–333. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1240097
Ching, Y. H., Hsu, Y. C., & Baldwin, S. (2018). Developing Computational Thinking with Educational Technologies for Young Learners. TechTrends, 62(6), 563–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0292-7
Clarke-Midura, J., Silvis, D., Shumway, J. F., Lee, V. R., & Kozlowski, J. S. (2021). Developing a kindergarten computational thinking assessment using evidence-centered design: the case of algorithmic thinking. Computer Science Education, 31(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1877988
Çoban, E., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2021). An alternative approach for measuring computational thinking: Performance-based platform. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100929
Corradini, I., Lodi, M., & Nardelli, E. (2017). Conceptions and misconceptions about computational thinking among Italian primary school teachers. ICER 2017 - Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3105726.3106194
Council, N. R. (2010). Report of a Workshop on The Scope and Nature of Computational Thinking. In Report of a Workshop on The Scope and Nature of Computational Thinking. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12840
Denning, P. J. (2009). The profession of IT Beyond computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 52(6), 28–30.
Denning, P. J. (2017). Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. In Communications of the ACM (Vol. 60, Issue 6, pp. 33–39). ACM New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998438
Falkner, K., Vivian, R., & Falkner, N. (2014). The Australian digital technologies curriculum: Challenge and opportunity. Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series, 148, 3–12.
Figueiredo, M., Gomes, C. A., Amante, S., Gomes, H., Alves, V., Duarte, R. P., & Rego, B. (2021). Play, Algorithmic Thinking and Early Childhood Education: Challenges in the Portuguese Context. SIIE 2021 - 2021 International Symposium on Computers in Education, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIE53363.2021.9583627
Furber, S. (2012). Shut down or restart? The way forward for computing in UK Schools. The Royal Society. In.
Garvin, M., Plane, J., Killen, H., & Weintrop, D. (2019). Primary school teachers’ conceptions of computational thinking. SIGCSE 2019 - Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 899–905. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287376
Gibson, J. P. (2012). Teaching graph algorithms to children of all ages. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2325296.2325308
González, J. J., Jiménez, J. A., & Ovalle, D. A. (2010). TEAC2H-RI: Educational robotic platform for improving teaching-learning processes of technology in developing countries. Technological Developments in Networking, Education and Automation, 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9151-2_13
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field. In Educational Researcher (Vol. 42, Issue 1, pp. 38–43). Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2023). Computational Thinking: A Competency Whose Time Has Come. In Computer Science Education (Vol. 19, pp. 1257–1258). Bloomsbury Academic London. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350296947.ch-005
Gu, M., Xu, X., Liu, X., Qiu, L., & Zhang, R. (2005). Preparation and characterization of GdTaO4:Eu3+ sol-gel luminescence thin films. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, 35(3), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-005-4169-9
Heintz, F., Mannila, L., & Farnqvist, T. (2016). A review of models for introducing computational thinking, computer science and computing in K-12 education. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2016-Novem, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757410
Hemmendinger, D. (2010). A plea for modesty. ACM Inroads, 1(2), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/1805724.1805725
Hsu, T. C., Chang, S. C., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers and Education, 126, 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2021). Standards for educators.
Jacques, L. A., & Howle, H. (2023). Computational Thinking (pp. 79–96). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5585-2.ch005
Jurado, E., Fonseca, D., Coderch, J., & Canaleta, X. (2020). Social steam learning at an early age with robotic platforms: A case study in four schools in Spain. Sensors (Switzerland), 20(13), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133698
Kalelioğlu, F., Gülbahar, Y., & Kukul, V. (2016). A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review. Baltic J. Modern Computing, 4(3), 583–596.
Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers and Education, 91, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005
Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Dickson, B. A., Nelson, V., & Makosz, S. (2022). Noticing and Naming Computational Thinking During Play. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(4), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01188-z
Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Khan, S., Namukasa, I. K., Somanath, S., Weber, J., & Yiu, C. (2017). A Pedagogical Framework for Computational Thinking. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-017-0031-2
Lamprou, A., & Repenning, A. (2018). Teaching how to teach computational thinking. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197091.3197120
Lee, I., Grover, S., Martin, F., Pillai, S., & Malyn-Smith, J. (2020). Computational Thinking from a Disciplinary Perspective: Integrating Computational Thinking in K-12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09803-w
Lu, J. J., & Fletcher, G. H. L. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking. SIGCSE Bulletin Inroads, 41(1), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/1539024.1508959
Mishra, P., Cain, W., Sawaya, S., & Henriksen, D. (2013). Rethinking Technology & Creativity in the 21st Century: A Room of Their Own. TechTrends, 57(4), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0668-7
Muñoz-Repiso, A. G. V., & Caballero-González, Y. A. (2019). Robotics to develop computational thinking in early Childhood Education. Comunicar, 27(59), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-06
Murcia, K., Campbell, C., & Aranda, G. (2018). Trends in early childhood education practice and professional learning with digital technologies. Pedagogika, 68(3).
Orvalho, J. (2017). Computational thinking for teacher education [Paper presentation]. Scratch2017BDX: Opening, Inspiring, Connecting, Bordeaux, France. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01555455/
Papert, S. (1996). An exploration in the space of mathematics educations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191473
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in thechild (M. Cook, Trans.).
Pila, S., Aladé, F., Sheehan, K. J., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. A. (2019). Learning to code via tablet applications: An evaluation of Daisy the Dinosaur and Kodable as learning tools for young children. Computers and Education, 128, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.006
Pugnali, A., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2017). THE impact of user interface on young children’s computational thinking. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 16(1), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.28945/3768
Qualls, J. A., & Sherrell, L. B. (2010). Why computational thinking should be integrated into the curriculum. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 25(5), 66–71.
Randolph, J. J. (2009). A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 14(13), 13.
Relkin, E. (2018). Assessing young children’s computational thinking abilities. Tufts University.
Relkin, E., de Ruiter, L., & Bers, M. U. (2020). TechCheck: Development and Validation of an Unplugged Assessment of Computational Thinking in Early Childhood Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(4), 482–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09831-x
Relkin, E., de Ruiter, L. E., & Bers, M. U. (2021). Learning to code and the acquisition of computational thinking by young children. Computers and Education, 169, 104222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104222
Resnick, M., & Silverman, B. (2005). Some reflections on designing construction kits for kids. Proceedings of: Interaction Design and Children 2005, IDC 2005, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/1109540.1109556
RodrÃguez-MartÃnez, J. A., González-Calero, J. A., & Sáez-López, J. M. (2020). Computational thinking and mathematics using Scratch: an experiment with sixth-grade students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448
Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2018). Extending the nomological network of computational thinking with non-cognitive factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.030
Saidin, N. D., Khalid, F., Martin, R., Kuppusamy, Y., & Munusamy, N. A. P. (2021). Benefits and challenges of applying computational thinking in education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(5), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.5.1519
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. In Educational Research Review (Vol. 22, pp. 142–158). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
Sun, L., Hu, L., Yang, W., Zhou, D., & Wang, X. (2021). STEM learning attitude predicts computational thinking skills among primary school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(2), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12493
Sysło, M. M., & Kwiatkowska, A. B. (2015). Introducing a new computer science curriculum for all school levels in Poland. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9378, 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25396-1_13
Ung, L. L., Labadin, J., & Mohamad, F. S. (2022). Computational thinking for teachers: Development of a localised E-learning system. Computers and Education, 177, 104379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104379
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
Wahyuningsih, S., Nurjanah, N. E., Rasmani, U. E. E., Hafidah, R., Pudyaningtyas, A. R., & Syamsuddin, M. M. (2020). STEAM Learning in Early Childhood Education: A Literature Review. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 4(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v4i1.39855
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M. S., Orton, K., Trouille, L., Jona, K., & Wilensky, U. (2014). Interactive Assessment Tools for Computational Thinking in High School STEM Classrooms. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST, 136 LNICST, 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08189-2_3
Wing, J. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking—What and why. The Link Magazine, 6, 20–23.
Wing, J. (2014). Computational thinking benefits society. 40th Anniversary Blog of Social Issues in Computing.
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725.
Wong, G. K. W., & Cheung, H. Y. (2020). Exploring children’s perceptions of developing twenty-first century skills through computational thinking and programming. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1534245
Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), 1–16.
Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2011). Introducing computational thinking in education courses. SIGCSE’11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953297
Yang, W., Luo, H., & Su, J. (2022). Towards inclusiveness and sustainability of robot programming in early childhood: Child engagement, learning outcomes and teacher perception. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1486–1510. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13266
Yang, W., Ng, D. T. K., & Gao, H. (2022). Robot programming versus block play in early childhood education: Effects on computational thinking, sequencing ability, and self-regulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1817–1841. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13215
Zhang, L. C., & Nouri, J. (2019). A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9. Computers and Education, 141, 103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607