Analisis Jawaban Siswa Usia 6 sampai 8 tahun terhadap Pembelajaran Sains Kreatif


Ramdhan Witarsa(1Mail), Dini Xena Dista(2),
(1) Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai, Indonesia
(2) Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai, Indonesia

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 530KB]  Language: id
Available online: 2019-09-28  |  Published : 2019-09-28
Copyright (c) 2019 Ramdhan Witarsa Witarsa
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 641 times PDF Downloaded: 286 times


Tujuan penelitian dari artikel ini adalah untuk menganalisis jawaban-jawaban siswa sekolah dasar kelas rendah terhadap pertanyaan-pertanyaan yang diberikan guru saat pembelajaran sains kreatif yang dilakukan di kelas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif. Guru memberikan sejumlah pertanyaan mengenai sains, kemudian siswa merespon jawaban tersebut, dan kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif kuantitatif. Pertanyaan-pertanyaan yang guru berikan berupa pertanyaan tertutup dan terbuka tergantung maksud dan tujuan pertanyaan tersebut diberikan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa jawaban-jawaban siswa sekolah dasar kelas rendah terhadap pembelajaran sains kreatif menunjukan jawaban-jawaban yang tergolong pada aspek-aspek kreatif. Kebaruan penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa aspek kreatif sudah nampak berkembang secara terstruktur pada siswa sekolah dasar kelas rendah. Pembelajaran sains kreatif perlu diterapkan sejak dini di sekolah-sekolah dasar agar kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa berkembang dengan baik secara terstruktur.


kreatif, pembelajaran, sains, siswa kelas rendah


Arslan, M. (2006). The Role of Questioning in the Classroom. Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of Education, 2, 81-103.

Aziza, M. (2018). An analysis of a teacher's questioning related to students' responses and mathematical creativity in an elementary school in the UK. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(4), 475-487.

Bal?m, A. G., eliker, H. D., Trko?uz, S., & Kaa, S. (2013). The Effect of Reflections of Science on Nature Project on Students ' Science Process Skills. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(16), 149-157.

Capraro, M. M., Capraro, R. M., & Cifarelli, V. V. (2007). What are students thinking as they solve open-ended mathematics problems ? Ninth International Conference of Mathematics Education in a Global Community, (October), 124-128.

Chin, C. (2007). Teacher Questioning in Science Classrooms: Approaches that Stimulate Productive Thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 157-162.

Cotton, K. (2001). Classroom Questioning. Federation Proceedings, 36(3).

Dogruer, S. S., Isiksal, M., & Koc, Y. (2015). A Case Study on Mathematical Classroom Discourse in a Fifth Grade Classroom Be?inci S?n?f Matematiksel Sylem zerine Bir Durum al??mas?. Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 299-322. Retrieved from

Dong, L., Clarke, D., Cao, Y., Wang, L., & Seah, W. T. (2019). Teacher questioning practices over a sequence of consecutive lessons: A case study of two mathematics teachers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(1).

Erdogan, M. (2011). The Effects of Ecology-Based Summer Nature Education Program on Primary School Students' Environmental Knowledge, Environmental Affect, and Responsible Environmental Behavior. 11(4), 2233-2237.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education.

Jacob, S. M., & Sam, H. K. (2008). Measuring Critical thinking in Problem Solving through Online Discussion Forums in First Year University Mathematics. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science, I, 19-21.

Kwon, O. N., Park, J. S., & Park, J. H. (2006). Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 51-61.

Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(3), 324.

McCarthy, P., Sithole, A., McCarthy, P., Cho, J., & Gyan, E. (2016). Teacher questioning strategies in mathematical classroom discourse : A case study of two grade eight teachers in Tennessee, USA. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(21), 80-89.

Shahrill, M. (2013). Review of effective teacher questioning in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(17), 224-231.

Sullivan, P., & Lilburn, P. (2002). Good Questions for Math Teaching: Why Ask Them and What to Ask, Grades K-6. In Teaching Children Mathematics (Vol. 10). Retrieved from

Ulleberg, I., & Solem, I. H. (2018). Which questions should be asked in classroom talk in mathematics? Presentation and discussion of a questioning model. Acta Didactica Norge, 12(1), 21.

Yee, F. P. (2000). Open-ended Problems for Higher-Order Thinking in Mathematics. Teaching & Learning, 20(2), 49-57. Retrieved from, tgl 15 Nov 2013

Yee, F. P. (2002). Using Short Open-ended Mathematics Questions to Promote Thinking and Understanding. Proceedings of the 4 Th International Conference on The Humanistic Renaissance in Mathematics Education, Palermo, Italy., 135-140.

Zahra, L., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Usodo, B. (2018). The kinds of questions asked by novice teachers in learning mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1).


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.