- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Model Penilaian Kemampuan Penalaran Proporsional pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Anak Usia 6-7 Tahun
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v3i2.209Keywords:
kemampuan proporsional penilaian penelitian pengembanganAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan produk penilaian yang digunakan untuk mengukur kemampuan penalaran proporsional mahasiswa calon guru anak usia 6-7 Tahun. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian pengembangan dengan model Borg and Gall, yang meliputi pengumpulan informasi, perencanaan, pengembangan produk awal, ujicoba one to one, revisi hasil ujicoba, ujicoba skala kecil dan ujicoba skala besar. Subjek penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa S1 PGSD yang dilakukan sebanyak tiga tahap ujicoba, yaitu uji coba one to one sebanyak 10 orang mahasiswa, uji coba kelompok kecil sebanyak 15 orang mahasiswa, dan uji coba kelompok besar sebanyak 30 orang mahasiswa. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan angket dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis data kualitatif dan analisis data kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian berdasarkan uji coba yang telah dilakukan serta dilihat dari tingkat kesukaran, reliabel dan kevalidan soal, maka diperoleh hasil akhir dari penggunaan produk penilaian sebesar 64,79%. Dari hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa model yang dikembangkan menunjukkan interpretasi yang baik dan layak untuk diimplementasikan sebagai alat penilaian untuk mengukur kemampuan penalaran proporsional.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Ann-Kim, S. (2003). Estimation games and proportional reasoning in young children, 5.
Arifin, Z. (2011). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arvyati, C. S. (n.d.). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah (PBM) terhadap kemampuan Penalaran Proporsional Siswa Sekolah Pertama. Pendidikan Matematika.
Bakker, A., Groenveld, D., & Wijers, M. (2014). Proportional reasoning in the laboratory : an intervention study in vocational education, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9393-y
Ceneida Fernandez, Salvador Llinares, Wim, Vandooren, Dirk De Bock, L. V. (2011). EFFECT OF NUMBER STRUCTURE AND NATURE OF QUANTITIES ON SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS ’, (2005), 69–82.
Dahar, R. W. (2011). Teori-teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.
David benchaem, James T. Fey, William M. Fitzgerald, Catherine Benedetto, J. M. (1998). Proportional reasoning among 7th grade student curricular experiences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 247–273.
Desmita. (2007). Psikologi Perkembangan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Dominguez, H., Lópezleiva, C. A., & Khisty, L. L. (2014). Relational engagement : Proportional reasoning with bilingual Latino / a students, 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9501-7
Fah, L. Y. (2009). Logical Thinking Abilities among Form 4 Students in the Interior Division of Sabah , Malaysia, 32, 161–187.
Gabriela, V. dan E. C. (2012). Prospective Elementary School Teachers Proportional Reasoning. PNA 7, 1–19.
Hilton, A., Hilton, G., Dole, S., & Hilton, A. (2016). Promoting middle school students ’ proportional reasoning skills through an ongoing professional development programme for teachers, 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9694-7
Jamaris, M. (2006). Perkembangan dan Pengembangan Anak Usia Taman Kanak-kanak. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Kathleen Westrich, C. B. (2011). Villi , Villi Everywhere : Biological Structures , Surface Area , & Proportional Thinking J J J Science Content & Proportional Science Content , Proportional, 73(3), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2011.73.3.7
Kingston, J. A., & Lyddy, F. (2013). Self-ef fi cacy and short-term memory capacity as predictors of proportional reasoning. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.017
Lesh, R., Post, T., dan Behr, M. (1988). Proportional Reasoning Number Concepts and Operations on the Middle Grades. Journal of Rston Lawrence Erlbaum & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Mardapi, D. (2007). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Non Tes. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Möhring, W., Newcombe, N. S., & Frick, A. (2015). Journal of Experimental Child The relation between spatial thinking and proportional reasoning in preschoolers, 132, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.01.005
Nur, A. S., & Rahman, A. (2013). Mathematics Problem Solving as a Medium to Develop a Formal Reasoning at Student of Junior High School, II(I).
Robichaux-davis, R. R. (n.d.). pad doubling Lily pad doubling : Proportional reasoning development, 73(2), 13–24.
Spinillo, A. G., & Bryant, P. (1991). Articles Children ’ s Proportional Judgments : The Importanee of ’ ’ Half ’, 427–440.
Walle, J. A. (2008). Pengembangan Pengajaran Matematika Sekolah Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Downloads
Published
17-07-2019
Indexing Check
How to Cite
Rosandi, R. T., Supriyati, Y., & Yetti, E. (2019). Model Penilaian Kemampuan Penalaran Proporsional pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Anak Usia 6-7 Tahun. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 3(2), 448–460. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v3i2.209
Issue
Section
Articles
