The Effect of Learning Models and Critical Thinking Skills on Understanding Physical Science

Ayu Citra Dewi(1), Hapidin Hapidin(2), Zarina Akbar(3),
(1) Universitas Negeri Jakarta
(2) Universitas Negeri Jakarta
(3) Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2019 Ayu Citra Dewi, Hapidin Hapidin, Zarina Akbar

DOI : https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v3i1.136

Full Text:    Language : id
Submitted : 2018-12-21
Published : 2019-01-05

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to know the effect of learning models and critical thinking skills on understanding physical science in group B aged 5-6 years. This research method is an experiment with 2x2 treatment by level design. The study sample consisted of 56 children. Collecting samples use the stratified multistage cluster random sampling technique. The data analysis technique was the analysis of two-way variance (ANAVA) and the Tukey test at a significant level α = 0.05. To test the normality of the data using the liliefors test and homogeneity test using the barlett test. The results of this study indicate that 1) Understanding of children's physical science taught by quantum learning models is higher than the learning model of contextual teaching and learning. 2) There is an influence of the interaction between learning models and critical thinking skills on understanding physical science. 3) Understanding of children's physical science taught by quantum learning models which have high critical thinking skills is higher than children taught with contextual teaching and learning models and those who have high critical thinking skills. 4) Understanding of children's physical science taught by quantum learning models who have low critical thinking skills is lower than children taught with contextual teaching and learning models and those who have low critical thinking skills.


Keywords


learning model; critical thinking; understanding of physical science

References


Bahaddin, M., & Yusuf. (2014). An investigation the effect of quantum learning approach on primary school 7th grade students ’ science achievement , retention and attitude. Educational Research Association The International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 5(2), 11–23.

Baharuddin, E. N. W. (2010). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Ar Ruzz Media.

Darmawan, I. P. A., & Sujoko, E. (2013). Revisi Taksonomi Pembelajaran Benyamin S. Bloom. Satya Widya, 29(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2013.v29.i1.p30-39

DeporteR, Bobbi, M. R. & S. S. N. (2010). Quantum : Mempraktikkan Quantum Learning Di Ruang-Ruang Kelas. Bandung: Kaifa.

Deporter, B. A. M. H. (2009). Quantum Learning : Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman Dan Menyenangkan. (Alwiyah Abdurrahman, Ed.). Bandung: Kaifa.

Donegan-Ritter, M. (2017). STEM for ALL Children: Preschool Teachers Supporting Engagement of Children With Special Needs in Physical Science Learning Centers. Young Exceptional Children, 20(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250614566541

Fuad, N. M., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving Junior High Schools’ Critical Thinking Skills Based on Test Three Different Models of Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1017a

George S. Morrison. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini (PAUD). Jakarta: Indeks.

Guo, Y., Piasta, S. B., & Bowles, R. P. (2015). Exploring Preschool Children’s Science Content Knowledge. Early Education and Development, 26(1), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.968240

Handini, M. C. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Untuk Pemula. Jakarta: FIP.

Hilda L Jackman, Nancy H. Beaver, S. S. W. (2015). Early Education Curriculum : A Child’s Connection to The World (Sixth).

Imam, G., & Anggraini Retno, P. (2015). Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Asesmen Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom. Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/2010

Johnson, E. B. P. . (2002). Contextual Teaching Ang Learning : What It Is And Way It’s Here To Stay. California: Corwin Press.

Kato, T., & Meeteren, B. D. Van. (2008). Physical Science in Constructivist Early Childhood Classrooms. Childhood Education, 84(4), 234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2008.10523015

Ketut Susiani, Nyoman Dantes, I. N. (2013). Kecerdasan Sosio-Emosional Dan Prestasi Belajar Ipa Siswa Kelas V Sd Di Banyuning Program Studi Pendidikan Dasar , Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja , Indonesia e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3(3).

Mattew Lipman. (n.d.). Critical Thinking: What can it be? https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018003004

Mcmurray, C. N. C. F. and A. (1997). Developing Children’s Critical Thinking through Creative Arts Exposure An Application of Ennis’s Super-streamlined Critical Thinking Framework CAROLINE. Assessment, 8.

Mulyasa. (2008). Menjadi Guru Profesional Menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment, N. R. council. (1996). National Science Education Standards National. Potentials. Washington,Dc: N Ational Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2005.11.005

Nugraha, A. (2005). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Sains Anak Usia Dini. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Olcer, S. (2017). Science Content Knowledge of 5-6 Year Old Preschool Children. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(2), 143–175. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lib.uconn.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1137395&site=ehost-live

Permanasari, A. (2014). Kurikulum 2013: Implikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran Di Sekolah, Pendidikan Profesi dan Pendidikan Tinggi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 1(1).

Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2011). Visual, Auditory, Kinaesthetic Learning Styles and Their Impacts on English Language Teaching. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v2i1.1007

Rosalind Charlesworth Weber State University, E., & Lind, K. K. (2010). Math and science for young children. (C. S. Development, Ed.) (SIXTH EDIT). America.

Santrock, J. W. (2007). Perkembangan Anak,11h Edition. Jakarta: erlangga.

Shouse, A. W. (2007). Slonczewski, Weiss - Physical Review - 1958.pdf. ( and A. W. S. Schweingruber, Ed.).

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D (20th ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Swerdlik, C. (2009). Psychology: Psychological Testing And Assessment: An Introducation To Test And Measurement 7th Edition. United State Of America: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Wong, M. S. (2007). A prospective study on the development of critical thinking skills for student prosthetists and orthotists in Hong Kong. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 31(2), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/03093640600983931

Yayuk, S. E. (2015). Pengaruh Model Quantum Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Ipa Dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Smp. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 95–111.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 135 times
 PDF Downloaded : 71 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.